Would you consider a post/ overview/ narrative on specific delta,
gamma, theta and vega numbers/ thoughts you personally consider while managing
your RUT portfolio?
REALLY enjoy your blog!
I cannot comply with your specific request because different situations require different solutions. But I made a trade yesterday – reported on twitter:
"Locked in a gain;
kept insurance, by adjusting: SOLD RUT SEP 570P that I BOT earlier and
replaced them with RUT Sep 550P. +$10.30 per spread"
This is an appropriate time to discuss the rationale for the trade. If it proves useful, I will do it whenever I have something interesting to report.
Part of my RUT September position:
RUT is currently 557
Short: RUT Sep 530/540 Put spreads
Long: A few RUT Sep 570 puts as insurance
My thoughts and trade rationale:
"I'm holding onto my September iron condor positions right now. I've already covered a few of the far OTM call spreads at 10 cents per spread and am not yet ready to cover any more spreads (RUT Sep 610/620 C) – at current prices.
The 530/540 put spreads are not that far OTM and may soon present a problem, but overall my portfolio is well protected, there is no reason to consider making a risk-reducing adjustment, and I don't want to pay the current price (> $2.00) to cover this spread.
The Sep 570 puts provide adequate protection right now. In addition, I own other puts that provide additional insurance, but that's not relevant to the trade under discussion.
One of the difficulties when buying insurance is that the trades are made at a debit, and if all positions expire worthless, the month will be profitable, but the cost of insurance reduces those profits. For some traders, the idea of paying cash for insurance is abhorrent because their entire philosophy is based on selling – not buying – premium. With that in mind, I believe it's prudent to look for opportunities to recover some, or all of the cost of insurance – as long as portfolio protection is not forfeited.
My favored method for accomplishing that goal is to roll down the options held for protection – and to collect a decent lump of cash. Thus, I entered an order to sell the Sep 570 puts and to buy an equal number of 550 puts. I might have chosen to buy the 560 puts, but I prefer to collect additional cash.
For this trade, I'm ignoring all the Greeks. This trade is obviously going to make my position longer (selling negative delta), but because I still own excellent protection and because I want to take some cash off the table, I feel that it is more important to satisfy those criteria than to be concerned with a small number of deltas. The overall portfolio does not have downside risk.
I sold the RUT Sep 550/570 put spread and collected $10.30 per spread. Is that a good trade? That's not the question. This trade accomplished something good for the portfolio – and that makes it 'good' by my definition:
a) I have $1,030 cash per spread
b) I still own protection against a disaster in the form of puts with a higher strike price than my short puts. To me, that's important.
c) This trade is equivalent to gamma scalping where a trader buys dips and sells rallies. [Using this method, I recently sold the RUT Sep 580/600 call spread at $10.20]
So what's the downside? What was lost? Answer: If the market tumbles, this spread could be worth $2,000 and I sold it for half that amount. In other words, in a disaster – where protection is needed – I've given up an additional $970 payout from my insurance policy, per spread. But, to me, it's not the $970 that I need. Owning extra puts is what is needed for insurance. I'm perfectly willing (for the right price) to trade in my 570 puts for 550 puts.
I must still watch this position because it may require an adjustment. If the market moves much lower, I will do something with the 530/540 put spreads. At the same time, I'll sell out my insurance (the 550 puts). Right now, I'm holding, looking for additional profit opportunities."